Novack Djokovic is received as a national hero after winning the Wimbledon 2022 tournament. The Serbian tennis player has become an emblem of resistance in his country, so the entire population has turned to his support after his decision to protect his body despite losing participations in important tournaments of the ATP circuit. In Serbia, only 48.23% of the population has been injected with the serum, a fact that makes the country one of the countries with the lowest rate of application of the anti-COVID serum.

Novack Djokovic es recibido como héroe nacional luego de conquistar el Torneo Wimbledon 2022. El tenista serbio se ha convertido en un emblema de resistencia en su país, por lo que toda la población se ha volcado en su apoyo luego de su decisión de proteger su cuerpo a pesar de perder participaciones en torneos importantes del circuito de la ATP. En Serbia solo se ha inyectado el suero el 48,23 % de la población, un hecho que convierte al país en uno de los de menor tasa de aplicación del suero anti COVID.

The low participation of citizens in US elections is a fact. The reason? ....There is no specific one that could explain this electoral apathy. Rather, according to studies and surveys carried out, this phenomenon is attributed to a set of factors, perhaps the main one being the fact that in European countries the State is in charge of registering new voters in the national registers, while in the United States , it is the individual responsibility of the people to register personally in the registry to have the right to vote. This situation "per se" lowers participation. By not being registered, the person cannot vote. Another factor is that Election Day coincides with work hours and on many occasions companies tacitly pressure their employees to attend work. In general, in the rest of the western countries, elections are held on a holiday or on Sundays. We also find that while direct voting exists in parliamentary countries, in the United States the electoral vote persists, a fact that produces demotivation in the electoral mass, since even when the favorite candidate of a citizen has obtained the greatest number of popular votes, even so can lose, that is to say that the election of the majority is not respected. Finally we must mention that the laws in the United States contemplate that each State sets the rules prior to each electoral process. This fact produces, among other factors, that in some states photo identification is required to vote, and in others not due to the issue of discrimination. Many voters claim they don't have the $20 it costs to get or renew a license, or I.D., so they sometimes have to sign an affidavit that the person is who they say they are. In addition to this, some States have the habit of changing the electoral circuits, depending on the possibilities of the party that has a majority in the legislature. And so far that has become a habit. In June 2022, the Supreme Court of Justice announced that it will create the mechanisms to end this practice, which, although it does not violate the constitution, creates conditions of little transparency in the electoral processes. This causes distrust in the voters and also lowers participation. As can be seen, there are multiple factors that cause low attendance. However, in the last 2 processes, the participation record in the presidential elections has been broken. North American society knows that it is at the most important moment in its modern history, so it is not surprising that in the next elections in November 2022 and 2024, the record for electoral participation will be broken again. Raul Alberto Diaz Journalist Writer Representative Government Chair Harvard University

On Wednesday night, the national team of Argentina led by Leo Messi literally crushed the national team of Italy in the match that defined the best in the world in terms of continents, the champion of the America's Cup Argentina against the European champion Italy. The match ended 3-0 thanks to the performance of the Italian goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma, who saved three sure goals from the South American steamroller. The match went one way with an absolute dominance of the Albiceleste, against an Italy that was not even the shadow of the squash that won the European Championship. Unfortunately, Italy gave a bad show in front of the millions of people who were waiting for this match. It will be up to the coach, Roberto Mancino to make the necessary corrections to try to get Italy back to a World Cup. argentina #italy #italy #worldcup #wembley #football #liomessi #paulodybala #giorgiochiellini

The next step that the United Nations should take has to do with its restructuring, not from the point of view of an extension or continuation, but through the creation of a new organism that adapts to the requirements of the nations and their citizens of today and above all, with greater transparency through the established mechanisms. Seeking to extend or give continuity to the current structure of the UN would be to turn on the same axis, which would basically offer the same result that we have had up to now. Creating a new structure with a fresh Charter signed by 193 nations, with equal rights and duties, would be the evident proof of the equity that the organization has sought so much for a long time, speaking in terms of the newest protagonists, those nations looking up from deep within the list of member countries. What formula to use to give balance and justice. The hottest topic on the creation of another structure to replace the UN, would be the formula to start. Which countries would make up the first Directory of the new body? Who would play the most important role? Perhaps it would start with the current permanent members of the Security Council, establishing periods of 5 years. Would they be selected by territorial size? or perhaps by population size? economic power? military power? or possibly it is the alphabetical order to rotate as has been done in some of the Commissions that currently make up the institution. Whatever the formula chosen by the 193 nations, it must be an egalitarian mechanism, which does not distinguish between size, economic or military power, skin color, or gender, since in this way the much promulgated egalitarian laws would be applied from the beginning. which lately has been boasting. To conclude, we must emphasize that the ultimate goal of this new institution, with a new Charter, fresh, free of historical commitments and updated where science and technology have a preponderant role, will be none other than to create equality between the nations that make up the United Nations Organization, but also strengthen the citizen role, against the threads of the macro powers that have subjected societies today. This would give greater transparency to the Institution, outside doors, even with the application of external audits. However, beyond this, the new body will have the difficult mission of protecting the citizens of the world, based on Human Rights. "Equality between nations will be the tool, and equality between citizens and power groups will be the goal to achieve the highest degree of peace and happiness possible" Raul Alberto Diaz Journalist Writer Final presentation of the Global Diplomacy Specialization from the University of London.

To start this presentation, it should be taken into consideration that to help peoples and people at an individual level, you must have the tools to fulfill that purpose. Otherwise any effort made will be sterile. From the conceptual point of view, Human Rights are the set of natural laws to which every human being is entitled, which have been specified in the Declaration of Human Rights put into operation since 1946 by the United Nations. , a responsibility in which Mrs. Eleonor Roosevelt, widow of the former President of the United States, had a leading role, for which Human Rights should be in a higher place in the scale of UN commitments. However, from a pragmatic point of view, these natural laws that every human being possesses "per se" cannot be implemented, at least in their entirety, as long as the current regulations included in the Charter of the United Nations are maintained, since several articles limit the effort that can be made to defend the peoples in the face of abuses by any government, and I quote: Article 7: "No provision of this Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of States, nor oblige Members to submit such matters to settlement procedures under this Charter; but this principle does not oppose the application of the coercive measures prescribed in Chapter VII." Despite the fact that Human Rights are used today as an argument for international relations, when referring to the States, as sovereign members of an Institution such as the UN, contradictions are difficult to overcome, which places this set of natural laws in a further position as far as effectiveness is concerned. Consequently, cases like that of Venezuela, in which its population has been violated by the dictatorship, including several murders, serves as an example to highlight that the sovereignty and self-determination of peoples, in many cases serves as a screen to hide reality. of the towns. From a real point of view, the current organizational model is very far from allowing actions that help the peoples equally, it is worth mentioning the Uyghur ethnic group as victims of China in a context where the latter is part of the P5. Knowing that in the political order there is little that can be done, and that the only tool available is the persuasion of abusive governments, we could direct the work of the Agencies of the Institution towards humanitarian aid or the management of support towards equality of race or gender. As a conclusion It could be inferred that the place occupied by human rights will depend on what type of help an individual or group needs. The implementation of Human Rights requires goodwill and individual principles or as a society. These elements make up the first rule and the cornerstone to be able to apply the natural laws to which all "Human" beings have a "Right". Raul Alberto Diaz Journalist Writer Specialization discussion project Global Diplomacy at the University of London

Since 2019, the United Nations has discussed and warned of the dangers of installing and using 5G technology. #a #un #5G

Desde el 2019 en las las Naciones Unidas se discutió y se advirtió de los peligros de la Instalación y utilización de la tecnología 5G. #un #onu #5G

Why not increase the number of permanent members of the security council? Is it for fear that the more members it would be, the more difficult it would be to reach an agreement? Because that is the argument that jumps out on paper when the topic is proposed for discussion. Or perhaps because the possible actors who could occupy the chairs, in most cases vote differently from the opinions of the 5 current permanent members? If so, the first term that appears is "Control", and in essence what it is about is making decisions that adjust to the interests of the majority of the countries, no matter how much the original members disagree. When the P5 was selected, back in the 40s of the last century, it was not projected that the decolonization of some territories would transform the political landscape of the world, so, after this successful process, it would be interesting to review what options exist to bring to the present this fundamental aspect of the Institution, such as security, incidentally one of the pillars on which the United Nations is founded. In 1996 the proposal to increase the number of permanent members was rejected due to Italy's refusal, as it was not taken into account as the loser of the 2nd war, along with Germany and Japan. More recently, India made the proposal to add 6 permanent members to the current 5. From a logical point of view, and with 193 members at present, it is a reasonable proposal, in the understanding that voting in two or three rounds among the permanent members when deciding on any issue, and as a consequence, selecting the 2 proposals with the highest number of votes, there would be no discord and on the contrary there will be greater Pluralism. When the P5 was selected, back in the 40s of the last century, it was not projected that the decolonization of some territories would transform the political landscape of the world, so, after this successful process, it would be interesting to review what options exist to bring to the present this fundamental aspect of the Institution, such as security, incidentally one of the pillars on which the United Nations is founded. Raul Alberto Diaz Journalist- Writer Specialization discussion project Global Diplomacy from University of London

In essence, the United Nations should be more than what it is. They should have fulfilled more transcendental objectives, even when some goals have been achieved. However, and beyond this aspect. The United Nations today has become a stagnant apparatus, which needs to be completely restructured. Defenders will emerge from both sides to describe facts such as the contributions made at the level of humanitarian aid, or the ceasefire achieved in Syria, or the work to face famine in different parts of the world. In the same way, there will be those who will say that those objectives achieved are an accessory, compared to what in 70 years an organization that devours a high budget and that is made up of more than 50,000 operators between the organization and the different agencies that it's made of. That is the reality of the history of the United Nations. What if it is a necessary organism. Yes, it is, more than that, it is a very important organization, but one that has been underutilized so far, seeing it from an operational point of view, and taking into account what it was created for. However, and in this aspect it must be precise, and it is that the United Nations as an organization today is stagnant, because as the world has evolved and the number of members has increased, for elementary reasons as a result of decolonization, for others one of the most important achievements of the entity, "The Institution is still in the power of the only 5 permanent members of the Security Council", and this fact logically leads to the vision of global organization development, being seen from a single optic. From the moment that Italy opposed the expansion of permanent members in 1996, when in fact the inclusion of Germany and Japan was proposed for being the losers of the Second World War, from that moment the setback began, since the The organization had the possibility of accepting Italy's refusal, to move forward and also offer the entry of this country, if it is that they were losers of the war, Italy was also one of the defeated. As a conclusion, from a personal point of view, today the United Nations needs to be restructured, as it has been raised on different occasions, since if this "rhythm" of medium action continues, each day it will be less effective in the work for which it was founded. It is fearful on the part of the writer to express distrust in this forum, in relation to institutions without external audit, but unfortunately as a Venezuelan I must state that experience and facts show that while an institution at the service of society, maximum if it is worldwide, it is not presented as transparent through the mechanisms established for this purpose, it will leave a negative image, even if it has fulfilled a task for which it was created, at least 50 percent. Lic. Raul Alberto Diaz Journalist Writer Project belonging to the course of Global Diplomacy at the University of London

The issue of the doping of the Russian figure skater Kamila Valieva, about whom some media have illuminated the top headlines of their publications, has turned incandescent yellow with the presumed positive for a heart drug, whose substance would have been detected in the month of December . However, both the Russian and Chinese authorities have maintained secrecy in this regard, seeking to make a decision adjusted to the truth and in accordance with the standards established by international organizations regarding doping. So far nothing has been said about any positive of Miss Valieva, of any anti-doping test carried out on the athlete in the present, that is to say so far in 2022. Therefore, it will be the relevant authorities that will determine if the retroactive character, on the suspicion of a positive last year, will have repercussions in the current Olympic Tournament. The current historical moment presents political and military conjunctures, which could influence the current winter Olympic tournament, for which the authorities of the international Olympic committee invite the media to maintain respect for the presumed innocence, until proven innocence. contrary, in this and in any other case that may arise in the development of the current sports competition. RAD.

La Federacion Venezolana de Futbol, ha decidido salir de las fronteras Venezolanas para reclutar el talento necesario para nuestra seleccion Vinotinto, en esta oportunidad la Femenina, con tres bienplanificados Try-outs que se estan realizando en los Estados Unidos. Nuestro Canal matriz "Bienvenidos Venezolanos", a traves del experto en Beisbol, John Homez, nos ha cedido la entrevista realizada al os representantes de la Federacion de futbol de Venezuela, donde explican en detalle de que se trata el proyecto "Nace un Sueño"